You are not logged in.

Dear visitor, welcome to Palo Community Forum. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

glvingne

Master

  • "glvingne" started this thread

Posts: 36

Date of registration: Feb 11th 2010

  • Send private message

1

Wednesday, December 1st 2010, 4:09pm

transfer of rules from 3.1 to 3.2

Good afternoon,

First of all congrats for the speed improvement with this new release: the same reports runs from 2.5 minutes to just 10 seconds now... great results !

unfortunately though a central rule does not work anymore. I have several rules, all working, except for one, containing a IF formula.

when i try only the "value if false" it works fine; only the "value if true" works as well... have you heard about a bug concerning the IF function?

additional info:
- the bug itself is that I receive a gigantic figure (10.000 Billion euros).
- i am calculating the FTE cost of a project: the info is coming from two cubes:
- the same cube, giving the number of FTE
- another cube (HR) giving the cost of the FTEs
- the IF function is there to use a fixed figure in case no data (the 'zero' value) comes from the HR cube
- formula:
['euros externe'] = B:[['FTE externe']] * IF(PALO.DATA("ICTRArun","HR",!'Office',"External","Average cost Ext") > 0,PALO.DATA("ICTRArun","HR",!'Office',"External","Average cost Ext"),126000)

Thanks a lot in advance!
Louis
_____________
Windows 7
Office 2010
IE9
Firefox 5.0

v_malicevic

Palo Team

  • "v_malicevic" is male

Posts: 454

Date of registration: Oct 26th 2005

Location: Germany

  • Send private message

2

Wednesday, December 1st 2010, 5:47pm

RE: transfer of rules from 3.1 to 3.2

Quoted

Originally posted by glvingne
the bug itself is that I receive a gigantic figure (10.000 Billion euros).


I wouldn't mind having that "bug" on my paycheck ;).

I'm not aware of problems with IF maybe you should post this under:

http://bugs.palo.net/mantis/public/
Mit freundlichen Gruessen/ With kind Regards / Meilleures salutations

Vladislav Malicevic
Head of Research and Development

Jedox AG

tish1

Sage

Posts: 761

Date of registration: Jul 13th 2009

Location: Vienna / Austria

Occupation: Senior Consultant @ Vector SW DV GmbH

  • Send private message

3

Wednesday, December 1st 2010, 9:56pm

Hi,

I can confirm that there are some problems when migrating models with complex rules. In my case a client's 3.1 CE model didn't return any values for at least one rule with multiple IF statements.
I'll post more on this as soon as I can set up a proper test case.

Regards.

glvingne

Master

  • "glvingne" started this thread

Posts: 36

Date of registration: Feb 11th 2010

  • Send private message

4

Monday, December 6th 2010, 10:04am

Good morning,

In this case it is a very simple IF statement.

if you want to replicate the bug, you can try this:
1. create a rule, having in the CONDITION argument a value coming from an other cube with a PALO.DATA
2. set 1 if true and 0 if false, for instance
3. when i calculate, i always have 58.000 as result, no matter if the condition is met or not

Strange isn't it?
_____________
Windows 7
Office 2010
IE9
Firefox 5.0

tish1

Sage

Posts: 761

Date of registration: Jul 13th 2009

Location: Vienna / Austria

Occupation: Senior Consultant @ Vector SW DV GmbH

  • Send private message

5

Thursday, December 9th 2010, 9:12am

Hi,

with that simple case, did you get support to confirm that there's a bug? Are they working on it?

Regards.

Rate this thread